Why is "the acceptance system for whistle-blowing which anyone feels relieved adequately and can use" necessary ?

There are lots of company disgraceful affairs whichre found out from whistle-blowing for these past several years. Why are these company disgraceful affairs found out more earlier? Perhaps employees cannot but pretended that they did not try to think about personnel evaluation and treatment, human relations in an office. However, who may blame the employee whom I did not accuse? When you moved their viewpoint to oneself, can you talk with fellow workers or bosses? Do you have courage to accuse it with only one?

If that cases, everyone should need the acceptance system for whistle-blowing which anyone feels relieved adequately and can use.

Reccently some companies set the acceptance system for whistle-blowing in the office, however most of that are set in the legal affairs department, the general affairs department, human resource department , a legal adviser office and so on. Incases of intarnal company, employee are afrind of the penalty ater whistle-blowing. In case of legal adviser office, it is not easy for most of employees to talk to the legal advisers directly. Legal advisers have to protect a company from legal risk so that it is hard to handle whistle-blowing.

In Japan, Public interest reporter protection method will be enforced in April, 2006, so that it becomes more important for companies to set the acceptance system for whistle-blowing which anyone feels relieved adequately and can use, and JCC thinks comapny have to have that to manage company disgraceful affairs risk.

Kokuhatsu.com, which provided by JCC works efficiently and effectively and helps your company to find out company disgraceful affairs more earlier and to deal that quickly before the risk become serious.

== Public interest reporter protection method ==

When a employees satisfied predetermined matters and did a public interest report about laws and ordinances violation to 1)the enterprise inside 2)administration 3)enterprise outside, Invalidity of discharge for a public interest reporters, prohibition of the other unjust handling are prescribed.

The predetermined matters are 5 things as follwings; 1) The whistle-blowers might take the handling that is a loss when they notify the inside and administration of corporate misdoing. 2) There might be evidence concealment by whistle-blowing. 3) There was not a fair reason, and it was demanded not to report to the inside and administration by the company. 4) There is not a notice of the effect to investigate after iwhistle-blowing by documents within 20th or there is not a fair reason, and the company does not investigate that. 5) The whistle-blower are in emergent danger of a life crisis, harm to a body having done occurring.